Tort Law: Evan Granowitz on the difference between standard of care and duty of care

As one of the brightest and established civil litigators in the state of California, Evan Granowitz helps clients in setting delineations on what constitutes standard of care and duty of care in the field of tort law.

Evan Granowitz Photo Credit: business-ethics.com

According to the author of Tort Law in the USA, Beau Baez III, care providers owe a duty of care to their clients, and are required to conform to a particular standard of care. For example, medical practitioners have a responsibility to provide care to their patients, and this action is upheld to a certain standard. This standard can be established in three ways, namely:

1. The default rule is that the person has a duty to act in a reasonably judicious manner;
2. The gauge can be created by a civil tort statute; and
3. The benchmark can originate from a criminal negligence per se canon.

Evan Granowitz Photo Credit: blog.studylink.com

Evan Granowitz is an established civil law litigator in Los Angeles, California. His fields of practice include unfair competition, business torts, breach of contracts, and officer litigation. Granowitz has been cited in the Rising Star list of Super Lawyers Magazine for three consecutive years since 2009.


Granowitz states that in the field of tort law, specifically in the area of negligence torts, the terms standard of care and duty of care are fairly common and each is reliant on the other. Granowitz states that what is breached in tort law is the standard of care element, and constitutes the cause of action for tort law actions.

Evan Granowitz Photo Credit: en.wikipedia.com

For more details about tort law and negligence, you can contact Evan Granowitz by checking out his microsite: www.evan-granowitz.org.