Thursday, January 19, 2012

Case solved: Evan Granowitz on judicial dispute resolution

A state’s legal system is a fundamental structure that provides resolution of many disputes. However, lawyers like Evan Granowitz state that while disputants can have options on the ways in which they could handle their cases, they will not reach agreement through collaborative processes. Some disputes have required the coercive power of the state to enforce resolution, although many private individuals and companies have hired professional representatives to protect them from perceived legal rights violation, civil misconduct, or other forms of social threat by other people.

From Evan Granowitz


In the United States, litigation functions as the most ideal form of judicial dispute resolution. Litigation commences when one party files suit against another, in which the process is administered by the government within federal, state, and municipal courts. This legal set-up is very formal and is governed by rules, such as rules of evidence and procedure.


Litigators like Evan Granowitz state that the conclusion of a certain case is based upon the decision of an impartial judge or jury. The verdict of the court is compulsory, not advisory; although involved parties have the right to appeal the judgment to a higher court. Judicial dispute resolution is complicated in nature, involving rivaling parties or opposing interests seeking an outcome that would favor their end.

From Evan Granowitz


In litigation, retired judges or private lawyers are often appointed to become arbitrators or mediators. However, recent trends have shown that trained and qualified non-legal dispute resolution specialists form a growing body of professionals practicing alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Many states in the U.S. are now practicing mediation or other ADR programs annexed to the courts to facilitate settlement of lawsuits.


From Evan Granowitz

More information about Atty. Evan Granowitz can be accessed at www.wolfgroupla.com.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Evan Granowitz on business torts

Evan Granowitz is among the top associates at the Los Angeles-based law firm, Wolf Group LA. He is an expert in civil litigation cases, including business torts.


From Evan Granowitz

Business torts refer to wrongful acts committed by or against organizations, usually involving intangible assets such as intellectual property and client relations. Other issues involving tort law include fraud, unfair competition, and breaches of fiduciary duties. Business fraud often involves misrepresentation, where a party falsifies a document in order to make another party arrive at decisions in a certain way, and embezzlement and forgery of work hours. Breaches in fiduciary duty include insider trading among corporate officers, while unfair competition refers to antitrust and intellectual property infringement.


Evan Granowitz Photo credit: Google Images

Legal experts such as Evan Granowitz also consider tortuous interference as a business tort. Tortuous interference happens when an action of tort goes against a business contract or other agreements. For example, when a business transaction is interrupted by a third party, it may either qualify as a tort action or as a false claim to lure customers away from a business.

Atty. Granowitz has extensive experience in business litigation and is very knowledgeable in cases involving unfair competition and multinational tort cases, including fraud. He has been included in Super Lawyers’ Rising Star list for three consecutive years already.

From Evan Granowitz


More about Evan Granowitz’s stellar career may be found at www.wolfgroupla.com.