Evan Granowitz: An authority in bankruptcy litigation

Litigators, like Evan Granowitz, represent individuals and financial institutions in workouts, enforcement and collection actions, and bankruptcy matters. They represent lenders in agented and non-agented credit arrangements and in debtor-in-possession financing transactions. With substantial experience in handling complex bankruptcy litigation, these lawyers have become a staple to the legal needs of numerous companies and professionals.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: Quickenloans.com

Atty. Granowitz has deep understanding about the business and legal issues that can and frequently arise across a broad range of financial transactions. His clients include funds specialists focusing in the purchase of distressed assets and loan portfolios, and providers of credit enhancement for securitizations and bond issues. He also represents lenders involved in issues such as equipment leases, factoring arrangements, and surety bonds.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: Bankruptcyhelpblog.org

Bankruptcy litigation’s dynamic nature requires bankruptcy trial lawyers, like Evan Granowitz, to have comprehensive knowledge of substantive and procedural bankruptcy issues to effectively apply their trial skills. Bankruptcy litigation also demands excellent judgment to constructively and aggressively discuss resolutions to multifaceted litigations in a competent and cost-effective manner. Atty. Granowitz, for one, combines these skills based on his expertise in bankruptcy law and procedure, his extensive trial experience, and the use of necessary resources to obtain favorable resolutions.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: Wolfgroupla.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz was named a Southern California Rising Star in 2009 and 2010 by Super Lawyers magazine. For more information about him, log on to www.wolfgroupla.com.

Evan Granowitz: Reputation built on discipline and proficiency

Evan Granowitz. Photo Credit: education.gov.uk

Evan Granowitz. Photo Credit: wolfgroupla.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz’ ability in the field of civil litigation has already been proven to be at par with that of other more veteran lawyers. Having been named a Southern California Rising Star for three consecutive years by the Super Lawyers magazine, Atty. Granowitz has well represented his contemporaries.

Atty. Granowitz represents clients from a broad spectrum of cases, including breach of contract disputes, unfair competition, business torts, corporate director and officer litigation, bankruptcy litigation, class action litigation, insurance coverage disputes, and other forms of complex litigation. His versatility in the field also makes him an icon to be looked up to, handling cases that range from Native American tribe aboriginal rights to multinational actions involving Internet gambling, fraud, and money laundering.

Atty. Evan Granowitz is admitted to practice his profession in California and in the United States District Court, and is an affiliate of the Orange County Bar Association and many other civil organizations. He graduated with a degree in political science and philosophy at the Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia in 2001. He received his law degree from Boalt Hall at UC Berkeley in 2004 and served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Joyce L. Kennard, Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court.

Atty. Evan Granowitz earned the American Jurisprudence award for his academic performance in contracts and the Prosser Prize for his excellence in corporate law. For more information about him, visit www.wolfgroupla.com.

Evan Granowitz. Photo Credit: Txchared.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz: The tort of interference with contractual relations

Evan Granowitz image credit: markcalore.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz was hailed a ‘Southern California Rising Star’ two years in a row (2009 and 2010) by Super Lawyers magazine. This honor is reserved only for the best lawyers in Southern California under the age of 40. He is admitted to practice in the State of California and the United States District Court—in the Northern District and the Central District of California.

Tortious interference, also referred to as intentional interference with contractual relations, happens when an individual deliberately violates the claimant’s contractual agreements or other business relationships. This form of tort is generally classified into two categories: one specific to contractual relationships, and the other specific to business relationships or activities.

Evan Granowitz image credit: whaleniplaw.com

According to litigators, like Evan Granowitz, the tort of interference with contractual relations authorizes an individual to recover damages based upon a declaration that another individual obstructed their contractual relations. The elements of an intentional interference with contractual relations claim include:

• A valid contract between claimant and a third party

• Defendant’s knowledge of this contract

• Defendant’s intentional acts designed to induce a breach or disruption of the contractual relationship

• Actual breach or disruption of the contractual relationship

• Resulting damage

To be considered tortious, a defendant’s actions must significantly infringe the standard of fair competition and free expression, such as a company influencing a bank not to provide a competitor with a capital loan.

Evan Granowitz image credit: wolfgroupla.com

More information about Atty. Evan Granowitz can be accessed at www.wolfgroupla.com.

Evan Granowitz and the typical elements that comprise embezzlement

Atty. Evan Granowitz and other legal experts help protect businesses from civil wrongs committed against them such as embezzlement.

Embezzlement is a crime involving fraudulent misappropriation of assets by a person, like an employee, to whom the assets have been entrusted. In the U.S., embezzlement is a statutory offense since the definition of the crime varies from statute to statute. Statutes governing the offense differ throughout the states. To know what elements comprise the offense, it is necessary to examine the particular statute applicable.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: Granowitz.law.blog

The most common elements of embezzlement are the following:
1. The property or asset must be owned by a person other than the accused. For instance, an employer or principal.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: Txchared.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz is one of the lawyers at Wolf Group L.A. He specializes in business torts, contract disputes, and insurance coverage disputes.

2. The property or asset must be converted subsequent to the defendant's original and lawful possession of it. Conversion happens when there’s unauthorized use or control of someone else's wealth.
3. The accused must be in a position of trust so that the property is held by him following a fiduciary duty, an obligation entrusted to someone when he agrees to act as an agent on another person’s behalf.
4. The intent to defraud the property owner at the time of the conversion is evident.

Evan Granowitz. Image credit: WolfGroupLA.com

Atty. Evan Granowitz is a recipient of the American Jurisprudence Award for his scholastic performance in contracts, and the Prosser Prize for his academic performance in corporate law. Know more about his expertise at www.wolfgroupla.com.