Case solved: Evan Granowitz on judicial dispute resolution

A state’s legal system is a fundamental structure that provides resolution of many disputes. However, lawyers like Evan Granowitz state that while disputants can have options on the ways in which they could handle their cases, they will not reach agreement through collaborative processes. Some disputes have required the coercive power of the state to enforce resolution, although many private individuals and companies have hired professional representatives to protect them from perceived legal rights violation, civil misconduct, or other forms of social threat by other people.

From Evan Granowitz

In the United States, litigation functions as the most ideal form of judicial dispute resolution. Litigation commences when one party files suit against another, in which the process is administered by the government within federal, state, and municipal courts. This legal set-up is very formal and is governed by rules, such as rules of evidence and procedure.


Litigators like Evan Granowitz state that the conclusion of a certain case is based upon the decision of an impartial judge or jury. The verdict of the court is compulsory, not advisory; although involved parties have the right to appeal the judgment to a higher court. Judicial dispute resolution is complicated in nature, involving rivaling parties or opposing interests seeking an outcome that would favor their end.

From Evan Granowitz

In litigation, retired judges or private lawyers are often appointed to become arbitrators or mediators. However, recent trends have shown that trained and qualified non-legal dispute resolution specialists form a growing body of professionals practicing alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Many states in the U.S. are now practicing mediation or other ADR programs annexed to the courts to facilitate settlement of lawsuits.

From Evan Granowitz

More information about Atty. Evan Granowitz can be accessed at www.wolfgroupla.com.